In Saanich the results have been gratifying.H.E. Hallwright
By the 1918-1919 school year, “the Saanich schools [were] well-advanced in school gardening,” reported School Inspector W.H.M. May.
Back in Fall 1917, District Agricultural Supervisor H.E. Hallwright had been promoting “dry farming.” This technique became important in 1919. Director of Elementary Agricultural Education J.W. Gibson observed: “In spite of the fact that the gardening season of 1919 was one of the driest in the history of the Province, we had some unusually good gardens…some very creditable gardens were operated without the use of artificial watering. This was accomplished by good fertilizing and careful cultivation; in other words, by the practice of dry farming methods in the conservation of soil moisture. This was best exemplified in some of the gardens in Saanich.”
It seemed Saanich was finally “getting” school gardening. H.E. Hallwright reported at the end of the 1918-1919 school year: “The character and function of nature-study and school-gardening have been appreciated and good work is being done. Much credit is due to the teachers themselves for the success of the work in Saanich. Through the Saanich Teachers’ Institute, the collective intelligence of the teachers has been brought to bear on the work, and through their influence public opinion has been to a large extent won over.”
Here are the school gardens and the responsible teachers in the 1918-1919 school year.
School Gardening a “frill”?
School gardening was apparently a success in Saanich, but in early 1920 it would appear that public opinion had not really been won over. In the post-war economic recession, Saanich residents were vocal about where their taxes were going. On the evening of February 25 1920, the Ward Two ratepayers met at Tolmie School and passed recommendations to the Council and School Board of Saanich that manual training, domestic science and school gardening be eliminated. (Ratepayers want drastic slashing, The Daily Colonist February 26 1920) By July 27 1920, The Daily Colonist reported: “There has been considerable agitation through the ratepayers’ associations against manual training, domestic science and school gardening. The parent-teachers associations, which have become so numerous in Saanich, defended the so-called ‘frills’.”
The “anti-frill” feeling that has expressed itself throughout various organizations in Saanich for some months past will have an opportunity to express itself at the polls when the ratepayers will choose a trustee to fill the place of Trustee Raven, who was forced to resign from the Saanich School Board last night owing to the fact that he no longer resides in the municipality.The Daily Colonist July 27 1920
The battleground was in the Saanich School Board. The Daily Colonist commented: “…If Trustee Holloway gains an ally in his crusade against the school trimmings, there will still be two trustees and Chairman Coates against him … it has already been decided at one meeting of ratepayers to make the “frills” question an election issue, and this vacancy in the school board of Saanich gives an excellent opportunity for doing so before the new year.”
In early August 1920, the election campaign was underway, despite (or because of?) the fact that Saanich School Board chairman Preston Coates, “an ardent advocate of “frills” and one of the mainstays of the parent teacher organization as it exists today in the municipality,” was away and would not return until shortly before September. “Mr. Coates may not return in time to marshal his forces for the hard fight which is bound to precede the polling.” (The Daily Colonist August 4 1920)
On August 21 1920, Saanich residents voted on water and sewer by-laws and for School Trustee. H. C. Oldfield defeated D. S. Tait, 616 to 359. As The Daily Colonist on August 22 1920 said: “The people of Saanich showed emphatically that they stand for strict economy in the schools and abolition of “frills” when they yesterday elected Mr. H. Clarence Oldfield.”
A few weeks later, it was time for the annual Saanich Fair. School children still competed for the “Butchart Cup” for best school garden (North Dairy school won). But we can see how Saanich was moving away from school gardening towards home gardening by school children: “The Department of Education and board of School Trustees of Saanich offered three prizes of $12, $7 and $5 for the best collection of garden produce grown in a home-garden by a school boy or girl under supervision of the school which they attend. Dudley Durrance took the first, and Harold Holyoak and Mamie Lidgate the second and third, respectively.” (The Daily Colonist September 16 1920)
In December 1920, School Trustee Reginald Chave resigned from the Saanich School Board. His resignation meant that three vacancies would have to be filled on the board when Trustee Diggon and Chairman Coates ended their terms at the end of 1920. At the last Saanich School Board meeting of the year, Trustee Holloway (“anti-frill”) “stated that the new Board could consider manual training, domestic science and school gardening. He claimed that to put manual training into efficient working order it would cost up to $6,000 next year, and he wondered if this amount should be spent in this way or whether it would not be better to establish night schools.” [A delegation from Gordon Head had come to the Board a couple of weeks earlier to ask them to establish a night class for boys who had left school.] (The Daily Colonist December 31 1920)
School gardening, as far as vegetable growing is concerned, will be nonexistent in Saanich this year.The Daily Colonist February 8 1921
On the night of February 7 1921, the Saanich School Board decided to dispense with the services of the District Agricultural Supervisor H.E. Hallwright. “The trustees went on record as favoring any form of nature study that can be taught by the regular classroom teachers. They also decided to inform the Department that they would be glad to co-operate with it in regard to the beautification of school grounds.” ( Vegetable gardens cut out by board, The Daily Colonist February 8 1921)
Here is a protest from former Saanich School Board chairman, Preston C. Coates Victoria Daily Times February 15 1921
“We have to cut somewhere, this was an obvious point”Saanich School Board Chairman Holloway, Victoria Daily Times March 1 1921
On February 28 1921, Director of Elementary Agricultural Education J.W. Gibson protested against cutting the gardens. He felt it would be a retrograde step to dispense with Mr. Hallwright’s services for the sake of a small saving to be made. He attended the School Board meeting and “…he asked whether the Board considered abandonment of agricultural instruction would be a progressive move for Saanich…” Here are some of the School Board’s discussions, reported in the Victoria Daily Times March 1 1921:
Trustee Mrs. Humphries [who had helped Gordon Head School start a garden in 1913] was outspokenly in favour of gardening studies, and maintained that there were areas in Saanich which strongly supported the courses. Mrs. Humphries said that as the tools were owned, the gardens were fertilized and the superintendent’s salary cost nothing, she would move that the resolution to abandon the system in vogue of past years be rescinded. This motion was unable to secure a seconder.
Trustee Oldfield said he was sure the main trouble was that, to most of the teachers, the gardens were just places to grow things; they had no idea of co-relating classroom studies with the gardening work, which was presumably the basic intent of the courses. [Aside — Oldfield is correct in this assumption – School Inspector for Saanich W.H.M. May often made comments that school gardens that did well were where the teachers are integrating garden and school lessons. Teachers were supposed to be learning all of this information at Normal School, so either it wasn’t sinking in, teachers were buying in] Trustee Oldfield stated that the main reason weighing with the Board when the gardening courses were abandoned had been the fact at the graded schools, where the pupils had reached the years to profit by the lessons, there were not sufficient grounds for the classes in gardening. After pointing to the deficiencies in gardening land at several schools, Chairman Holloway stated that it was futile to grow vegetables under such handicaps.
Mr. Gibson agreed that some of the schools were not properly equipped for gardening, and declared that vegetable growing was not the objective of the studies; to stimulate the minds of growing youths was the main intent of the studies.
Nonetheless, the Saanich School Board dispensed with Hallwright’s services. In his report on the 1920-1921 school year, Hallwright merely noted: “Agricultural instruction – especially that part which had to do with school gardening – has, in Saanich, for several reasons, suffered a reverse.”
Agricultural instruction was suffering a reverse in other parts of the Province. J.W. Gibson submitted his annual report on Elementary Agricultural Education for 1920-1921, noting a Province-wide decline in gardens: “During the year, school gardens were discontinued in a number of schools in favour of supervised home gardens, whilst in others they were discontinued on account of unfavourable gardening conditions or on account of expense.” [After this comment, Gibson then devoted a large paragraph trying to promote the educational value of the school garden, but it was clearly a losing battle.] Patrick A. Dunae writes: “…during the post-war recession, the provincial government was unable and unwilling to maintain Gibson’s programmes without substantial support from Ottawa. (The Homeroom)
Saanich continued to cut “frills” — In early 1923 the Saanich School Board eliminated the Manual Training Program. But note that at the same meeting, trustees discussed the beautification of school grounds. Trustee Hobbs [who had called the manual training course “a waste of time and money”] dwelt upon the value of a beautiful environment for the children. (Drastic Economy Moves By Board, The Daily Colonist February 1 1923)
Aside — Lest we think that the Saanich School Board were Scrooges, keep in mind that for several years they had promoted school nurses and in the early 1920s were supporting the Saanich Health Centre where children could get affordably priced dental care.
In 1924, the ten-year funding for agricultural education had ended and British Columbia’s Elementary Agricultural Branch was “pruned drastically,” as Patrick A. Dunae writes. District supervisors were dismissed in 1925 and the program ended in 1929, when J.W. Gibson was appointed Director of the High School Correspondence Branch. Dunae concludes that “this experiment in progressivism had become little more than a vehicle for landscaping urban and municipal school sites.”